4 ms·
> a bit thin on references I've seen mentions of the fact that the Gizmodo version removed most of the links/references/graphs that were included in the origin
by dudul 9y ago
> a bit thin on references
I've seen mentions of the fact that the Gizmodo version removed most of the links/references/graphs that were included in the original.
- jackvalentine 9y agoOh dear. If that's the case then I'm very confused.
- scruple 9y agoThat what, Gizmodo might mislead people for clicks?
- lisper 9y agoThe original is here: https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3914586/Googles-Ideological-Echo-Chamber.pdf https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3914586/Googles-I... At least I'm pretty sure that is the original. It has the author's name on it.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- dilap 9y agoWow, you're right, per the lisper link. That is extremely shady of Gizmodo.
- jasonwatkinspdx 9y agoSigh, it wasn't gizmodo being shady, it's just there's multiple leaked versions and some of the leakers only supplied html/text.
- stagbeetle 9y ago"The text of the post is reproduced in full below, with some minor formatting modifications. Two charts and several hyperlinks are also omitted." Per the article itself.