The parent’s comment, which you claim is “abhorrent” and ignoring science, states: > There's nothing in his evidence about women's personality traits that can

The parent’s comment, which you claim is “abhorrent” and ignoring science, states: > There's nothing in his evidence about women's personality traits that can lead you to the conclusion that they're necessarily underrepresented in STEM and in computer science. Please explain where in either of your sources it says that women should be underrepresented in STEM and computer science - at all (why not the other way around?), let alone to anywhere near the extent seen today. Hint: nowhere. Getting to there from personality quizzes is the unsubstantiated logical leap the parent was talking about.