Thank you for your (abhorrent) attempt at belittling someone who is trying to educate you about what is actually mainstream science: http://www.sciencedirect.c

Thank you for your (abhorrent) attempt at belittling someone who is trying to educate you about what is actually mainstream science: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042812017168 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042812... https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/games-primates-play/201201/gender-differences-in-personality-are-larger-previously-thought https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/games-primates-play/201... As for the rest of your comment, it perfectly illustrates my comment above about critics having no clue what this guy is saying. At the very minimum, you are dead wrong to claim the author does not say that diversity is important and that Google should not address it. He simply says it should be addressed in non-discriminatory ways, something any sensible reader should have noticed had they read the ENTIRE SECTION he included titled "Non-discriminatory ways to reduce the gender gap". And with that, I'm jumping out of this discussion: it pollutes the HN discussion section to have to repeatedly state what the article under discussion actually says.