3 ms·
IMO, Zunger's dismissive and "corrosive" response does nothing, but reinforces the original author's point about the majority's oppressive censorship. https://
by tooltalk 9y ago
IMO, Zunger's dismissive and "corrosive" response does nothing, but reinforces the original author's point about the majority's oppressive censorship.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2017/08/07/googles-diversity-rumpus-the-fun-thing-is-hes-right-about-the-cause-of-the-gender-disparity/#44a84b052b41 https://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2017/08/07/googles-...
- koomi 9y agoAgreed. I don't grasp how, in response to a text lamenting a lack of psychological safety and fear of being shamed into silence, a response which essentially states "what you said was stupid, you should never have talked about it and this will have negative consequences for your career" can be considered appropriate, let alone as having a positive impact in any meaningful way.