3 ms·

I count 1001, 1002 and so on.

• Fnoord 9y ago
  Works as well, and 1000 might be an easier modifier than 20 in some situations. Downside is there's going to be a difference in elapsed time between { 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1012 } and 1013+. Regardless, better than conventional { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12 }.