4 ms·
Occam's razor says it's because the capability to gather far exceeds the NSA's ability to analyze. The data they collect is probably run through basic automated
by javajosh 9y ago
Occam's razor says it's because the capability to gather far exceeds the NSA's ability to analyze. The data they collect is probably run through basic automated analysis (probably keywords, sentiment, and social network analysis, possibly some attempt to correlate to interesting real-world activity like purchase of large amounts of fertilizer, etc). But mostly the cache is used for retroactive surveillance to catch colluders after an event. The data would also be useful for local law enforcement (a kind of "super tap"), and certainly they have the eyes (if not the skill) to analyze the data, but that's a political hot potato. (And thank God - there are plenty of local police chiefs just itching to send the SWAT team in to a family home based on NSA "cyber").
Note that one of the more useful and interesting uses for this data would be political demographic analysis more comprehensive than anything available legitimately. It could also be used to target leakers, especially if you could use devices to put 3rd parties in the same room. E.g. my phone hears or sees you and your friend together, even if you don't have phones.
- dsfyu404ed 9y ago>But mostly the cache is used for retroactive surveillance to catch colluders after an event. The bar for collusion is really low. Look at what happened to the pot dealer for the guys that bombed the Boston marathon. The odds of any one transaction coming back to get you are practically and almost literally zero but when something bad happens it doesn't happen in a vacuum. The bank robbers have to buy their getaway car from someone.