Looks like you're trying to creatively reinterpret the comment you're responding to into something that's easier for you to take down. I don't see where QAPere

Looks like you're trying to creatively reinterpret the comment you're responding to into something that's easier for you to take down. I don't see where QAPereo says the thing that you say they're saying. (In fact, I see the opposite, but that's beside the point.) EDIT: Three people (strictnein, nicky0, EpicEng) show up to point out the comment I'm referring to said it's "just another [...] walled garden". Er, yes. That's my entire reason for commenting. I can see the words that were written. Which is why I'm calling out the person I replied to for asking a question that suggests those words say something else. Here's a breakdown of what has just occurred: Person A suggests it's no different from any other walled garden that's come around before. Person B asks Person A to defend the stance that it's different from other walled gardens. I point out the contradiction between what Person A has said and what Person B apparently wants Person A to have said. Then you all show up. Why are we here? I'm gonna leave HN for a while.