4 ms·

It is not a realistic option for an author of accessible software to ignore JAWS. Obviously, open source software has no obligation to support accessibility, bu

It is not a realistic option for an author of accessible software to ignore JAWS. Obviously, open source software has no obligation to support accessibility, but that means that it'll be used less (this does not just affect visually impaired people, but also organizations and companies that have a need or obligation to keep their systems accessible; ADA compliance, for starters). So, yes, open source programmers are perfectly within their rights to ignore that audience, and that audience is perfectly within its rights to not use open source software that doesn't meet their accessibility needs and to warn others and advocate against the use of such software.

Sean1708 9y ago
If the linked bug[0] is to be believed it sounds like JAWS are ignoring QT, rather than the other way around. [0]: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-53024 https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-53024
- falcolas 9y ago
  A distinction without a difference, if you're trying to write accessible software. QT promised something it couldn't deliver. Marketing at its finest. /s
- SyneRyder 9y ago
  I'm not sure about that - it also mentions that Qt is incompatible with Microsoft Narrator. If it doesn't work with the screen reader that comes bundled with the operating system, it suggests Qt is doing something wrong.
  - deleted 9y ago
    [deleted]