3 ms·
This is a very long, very technical article. I really won't understand much of it as it is now. And that's a pity because this is a question that needs to be un
by d--b 9y ago
This is a very long, very technical article. I really won't understand much of it as it is now. And that's a pity because this is a question that needs to be understood and debated.
I think that unless there is a digestible version of the arguments along with the general counter arguments, it's not a very useful read. And comments are just going to be undocumented reaction to the title...