3 ms·
Infuriating! An high-priest of the church of the economists does his job of exonerating politics from ugly social change, with "IT" as the sacrificial goat. T
by polotics 9y ago
Infuriating!
An high-priest of the church of the economists does his job of exonerating politics from ugly social change, with "IT" as the sacrificial goat.
The obvious counterpunch "what about politics" gets this answer doubling down slimy-leech style:
(Quote)
A Final Note
The IT revolution has brought about improvements in living standards and its great technical
achievements enjoy a very high level of consumer and political support. However, these sources of
social benefits are also the cause of social losses and rising inequality that threatens the foudation of
our democrastic socieity. Th uniqueness of this study is that it focuses on the effect of technological
change on efficiency and distribution and although we show modern developments in IT enabled
higher barriers to entry, rising market concentration and increasing monopoly power of firms, we have
avoided a policy evaluation. Yet, although these developments enjoy substantial public popularity it is
only a matter of time before we shall need to debate the appropriate public policy to response to the
social changes we face. To illustrate the need for some urgency consider the exmple of social
networks. These are, in fact, privately owned public utilities. Subversive and terrorist groups have
used the internet and social networks for coordinating their activities and these social networks have
been a key tool for spreading rumors and conspiracy theories or, more generally, for proliferation of
"fake news." These are national security problems and are challenges to the proper functioning of an
informative press in a Democracy. The question we face is who should make the decisions on how to
respond to these problems? Today it is entirely up to the private firms who own these channels to
formulate good public policy decisions. This is not likely to remain a satisfactory solution.
(End of quote)
What about salaries and negotiation powers, financialisation and asset-prices inflation?
- dang 9y agoWould you please not post ideological rants to HN? Even if you're right, it lowers the quality of discussion below what we're hoping for here. Actually being right makes it worse.
- throwayawnotime 9y agois this censorship? the posted article is clearly ideological
- throwayawnotime 9y agoalso, how does a two-liner + a quote from the article qualify as a "rant"?