I share your confusion about the 50/50 split. > Recognising some groups lack one or more of those things is a good start. Recognising some groups (deliberately

I share your confusion about the 50/50 split. > Recognising some groups lack one or more of those things is a good start. Recognising some groups (deliberately or accidentally) monopolize those things to the detriment of others is a better start. If like to propose an even better recognition: that no one is monopolizing anything and both groups are making the choices that best match their priorities.