> But Ruby [...] did all that stuff much better and more cleanly. But it's taken Ruby a lot of years to get there. And even now, I'd suggest Ruby's `refinemen

> But Ruby [...] did all that stuff much better and more cleanly. But it's taken Ruby a lot of years to get there. And even now, I'd suggest Ruby's `refinements` need more maturing for it to be clear. "uplevel" was wonderfully powerful for creating DSLs, even if rather sharp-edged to develop with.