I think the idea that people 'believe' that segregated cycle lanes are needed vs the last 30+ years of promoting Vehicular Cycling with little to no growth in c

I think the idea that people 'believe' that segregated cycle lanes are needed vs the last 30+ years of promoting Vehicular Cycling with little to no growth in cycling, and achieving double digit yearly growth once they started building segregated cycle lanes shows that it is an evidence based solution. Cycling is consistently the fastest way to get from A to B in a city. Cycle infra makes other traffic faster and protects pedestrians. The economic benefits are huge as well and proven. So I still do not understand why you think the idea that given a choice, investing in BRT is a better solution.