3 ms·
>No one is "lowering standards" for diverse hires. No one. Why are you even implying this? Without wading into the general content of the manifesto, I haven't
by Inconel 9y ago
>No one is "lowering standards" for diverse hires. No one. Why are you even implying this?
Without wading into the general content of the manifesto, I haven't had the time to read it, and while not directly regarding hiring, there is at least one good example where the quest for a more diverse pool has lead to differing standards being applied, namely university entrance. From the stats I've seen, Asians in the US are fairly strongly penalized with regards to the grades and test scores they need to achieve in order to gain entrance to top universities when compared to their White, African American, or Hispanic counterparts. It certainly seems to me that the standards have been lowered for non-Asians in this area, and while I make no claim of this also occurring in the hiring process, I also don't think it's an unfair question to ask seeing as it seems quite widespread in university admittance.
- MichaelGG 9y agoExactly. Here's acceptance data[1]. Blacks with a GPA of 3.4+ and MCAT of 36+ have an acceptance rate near 100%. For Asians, the acceptance rate is far lower. Just open the two races' PDFs and tab between them. I'm sorta surprised they even publish this, considering how bad it looks. But maybe there's an alternative explanation, like smaller sample size, or Asians being less likely to be well rounded candidates, or maybe it's flat-out race quotas. 1: https://www.aamc.org/data/facts/applicantmatriculant/157998/factstablea24.html https://www.aamc.org/data/facts/applicantmatriculant/157998/...