>This guy clearly thinks less of the women he works with Can you cite the part of the manifesto which made you reach this conclusion? >I doubt women at Google

>This guy clearly thinks less of the women he works with Can you cite the part of the manifesto which made you reach this conclusion? >I doubt women at Google would feel pleased about that Why? I didn't see anything insulting or disrespectful in the article. Perhaps your mind filled in things not said? For example: I openly admit that I suck at empathy. I am socially awkward, I have hard time relating to other people. I may have EDD. Not only do I recognize that women are better at it I prefer female managers to male managers because all my female managers innately understood psychological safety. And fostered such culture. Is it anecdotal? Yes. But it is consistent with the author's observations that we are different. It is consistent with the Big Five personality trait studies in psychology. So I think shutting down this line of reasoning is effectively an attempt to block attempts at better understanding of what makes us different. And yet if we actually understand each person's strengths AND weaknesses we will be able to build better organisations!