The argument basically proceeds as follows: 1) Gender differences exist 2) ??? 3) Differences in representation are explainable by gender differences Really

The argument basically proceeds as follows: 1) Gender differences exist 2) ??? 3) Differences in representation are explainable by gender differences Really? I read it as 1) Gender differences exist 2) Differences in representation may be at least partly due to gender differences. 3) Differences in representation should not be taken as automatic proof of bias.