3 ms·
I won't say anything positive or negative about either the original post or the rebuttal because publicly touching any of this is career suicide. But I will com
by seibelj 9y ago
I won't say anything positive or negative about either the original post or the rebuttal because publicly touching any of this is career suicide. But I will comment that as assertive the original author was about things, citing various facts and studies, was not the rebuttal similar in repeatedly saying the original author was wrong and citing his own studies? Can anyone in social science really say anything is fact? Social science is about the weakest "science" there is in terms of absolute proof and sureities
- orangecat 9y agoThe rebuttal cited no studies. It asserts that the manifesto's claims about gender "flies directly in the face of all research done in the field for decades", and as far as I can tell this is utterly false.
- nopatternhere 9y agoWhat's great is the next sentence: "But I am neither a biologist, a psychologist, nor a sociologist, so I’ll leave that to someone else." So, you know it is false, completely, and that we should ignore it because it is false, but you are unqualified to provide any examples? Sigh.
- ggggtez 9y agoRead the authors other posts on the same medium blog for his rebuttal of your arguments. I'd rather not paraphrase.