3 ms·
Ha. The Evolutionary Psychology wiki is probably a good start, but if you're skeptical of evolution I'm not confident anything I'd link would convince you.
by remarkEon 9y ago
Ha. The Evolutionary Psychology wiki is probably a good start, but if you're skeptical of evolution I'm not confident anything I'd link would convince you.
- acdha 9y agoSkeptical of evolution? That's a telling misrepresentation — ask for scientific evidence for random unsupported speculation and be accused of not believing in science? Again: do you have any citations? If this was as well as established as you're claiming they should be easy to provide.
- remarkEon 9y agoSure, let me google that for you... Quit being weird and pretending males and females are the same.
- Pulcinella 9y agoWhy? Evolutionary psychology (even if true) is completely unenlightening. Anyone can be an evolutionary psychologist!: "Men do [thing] because they evolved to." "Women think [this] because women who didn't did not pass on their genes."
- remarkEon 9y agoNot going to engage further if your summation of Evolutionary Psychology is that it's "unenlightening". I can't stand this bizarre trend on the Left that holds up "science" as a vanguard in one context but dismisses it in another if it's politically convenient.
- Pulcinella 9y agoBecause Evolutionary Psychology is not science. It makes no predictions. It has no theories. It is untestable. It entirely relies on just-so stories.
- wfo 9y agoThe fact that you whine about anyone disagreeing with you being some bogeyman you call "the Left" (which does not exist of course) is telling; instead, you should consider your discussion partners as people instead of the enemy, perhaps then you will provide arguments that are not you just stating the thing you desperately want to be true over and over again and we can all learn something.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]