3 ms·

This simply rehashes and old and badly made argument from months ago... I mean, the Ars article was a bit "out there" but he clearly hasn't really read it (e.g

by ErrantX 16y ago

This simply rehashes and old and badly made argument from months ago... I mean, the Ars article was a bit "out there" but he clearly hasn't really read it (e.g. The idea that I have a moral obligation to stare at an advertisment, the thought I have an ethical obligation to voluntarily annoy myself for the sake of a company's profits... it would be hilarious if it wasn't so repugnant.)

petercooper 16y ago
You realize this IS months old, dude? :-) It's a dupe, as is this discussion.
- ErrantX 16y ago
  Heh, oops. Oh well; I saw another post from this blog earlier in the day and never really considered that it was an earlier entry :P
petercooper 16y ago
You realize this IS months old, dude? :-) It's a dupe, as is this discussion.