> a motivated collection of cherry-picked data points put together to suit the author's political purpose How very ironic you should say that, given the author

> a motivated collection of cherry-picked data points put together to suit the author's political purpose How very ironic you should say that, given the author's interesting demonstration (with figures) in that very same post of the propensity of the other side to over-cite weak studies that fit the desired narrative, and under-cite inconvenient ones with orders of magnitude better sample sizes and methodology. > Please provide real research. Indeed...