3 ms·
Yes but that's still the soft science of sociology and the author of the OP should tread carefully before asserting this as literal fact. It remains a conclusio
by Quarrelsome 9y ago
Yes but that's still the soft science of sociology and the author of the OP should tread carefully before asserting this as literal fact. It remains a conclusion of incomplete results. Obviously better than complete speculation but still no stronger than the technology used by the culture this OP is rallying against.
- renaudg 9y agoIt's arguably the culture that the OP is rallying against which relies on the "soft science of sociology" as a theoretical basis. The OP's point on the other hand finds most of its supporting evidence in evolutionary psychology and biology.