24 ms·

The first few paragraphs were the only reasonable parts of the entire document. It quickly goes off the rails. >Edit: two paragraphs in and it's making lots of

The first few paragraphs were the only reasonable parts of the entire document. It quickly goes off the rails. >Edit: two paragraphs in and it's making lots of well reasoned points. Why the outrage? And why the outrage before the majority of people actually read the thing? Ironic... did you actually read the thing? Past the first "two paragraphs," anyway?

throwaway080517 9y ago
The personality trait section appears to at least be consistent with current findings[1]. I see a lot of comments on the article berating the "De-emphasize empathy" section as well, but it's starting to become clear empathy has a lot of bugs in it. Paul Bloom advocates for compassion instead of empathy[2]. There's definitely assumptions in the article e.g. Men (may) prefer coding due to the average innate preference of things vs people (and then vice versa for women)and the belief programs exclusive to minorities due more harm than good, but outside of those this seems like a fairly well researched document that, for better or worse, has a dissenting opinion from the group. [1] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3826203/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3826203/ [2] https://www.amazon.com/Against-Empathy-Case-Rational-Compassion/dp/0062339338 https://www.amazon.com/Against-Empathy-Case-Rational-Compass...