3 ms·
> I was willing to give him a fair hearing until he listed a handful of differences between men and women that he ascribes to biology without any factual suppor
by bmn__ 9y ago
> I was willing to give him a fair hearing until he listed a handful of differences between men and women that he ascribes to biology without any factual support.
You've been punked, Gizmodo journalism at its finest!
Kate Conger withheld the factual support so that to a not-careful reader it looks like the original poster just makes stuff up.
ctrl + f: "Two charts and several hyperlinks are also omitted."
Note the passive sentence construction. If only she had written truthfully, "I omitted two charts and several hyperlinks"…
- chrismcb 9y agoI'm missing something, but how are those two statements different. I read the first sentence "gizmodo omitted two charts and hyperlinks" my assumption was the charts and hyperlinks held company data or pointed to company websites. But how does changing the sentence to "I omitted..." Change anything? It did you assume the omission was done by someone outside of gizmodo?
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- DuskStar 9y agoI think he's suggesting that the removed charts and links were the evidence in question, and that the author purposely removed them to make the documents arguments look weaker/less supported.
- agarden 9y agoHave you seen the charts and hyperlinks? I was quite puzzled that they would be left out.