3 ms·

It's a good list and these points are indeed very bad signals. When you break it down most points fall under the category of basic professional courtesy and it'

It's a good list and these points are indeed very bad signals. When you break it down most points fall under the category of basic professional courtesy and it's shocking how rare that is. Most people that I interview and give prompt and honest feedback really appreciate it. You do have to deal with the occasional rude response however - it's the cost of being a professional. "They tell you they like you, you’d be a great fit, your code looks great, but then discontinue because they just noticed you don’t have a piece of paper." It could be that they somehow didn't notice and then singularly rejected you for that reason. It's also possible that they were willing to overlook it but once they had the chance to evaluate you as a whole they decided that the total package wasn't enough and the degree was the reason given. To me the degree is more about proving that the candidate has true interest in the subject and has been able to commit to it over an extended period of time more than anything else. I am asking them for a big commitment over an extended period of time to join my company after all.

birken 9y ago
> It's a good list and these points are indeed very bad signals. When you break it down most points fall under the category of basic professional courtesy and it's shocking how rare that is. Most people that I interview and give prompt and honest feedback really appreciate it. You do have to deal with the occasional rude response however - it's the cost of being a professional. This is very true. Interviewing is critical for basically every company, but the actual interview process sucks for the employee who actually is doing it. A lot of companies, and startups especially, don't have the discipline or foresight to realize this and instill in their employees that professional courtesy is important, even if the actual interviewing process is annoying and that professional courtesy is likely to be "wasted" on somebody you won't hire. But I do think it is a useful (bad) signal, because a company that doesn't have the foresight to create a decent interview experience probably is dropping the ball in other critical areas and should be avoided.

birken 9y ago

> It's a good list and these points are indeed very bad signals. When you break it down most points fall under the category of basic professional courtesy and it's shocking how rare that is. Most people that I interview and give prompt and honest feedback really appreciate it. You do have to deal with the occasional rude response however - it's the cost of being a professional. This is very true. Interviewing is critical for basically every company, but the actual interview process sucks for the employee who actually is doing it. A lot of companies, and startups especially, don't have the discipline or foresight to realize this and instill in their employees that professional courtesy is important, even if the actual interviewing process is annoying and that professional courtesy is likely to be "wasted" on somebody you won't hire. But I do think it is a useful (bad) signal, because a company that doesn't have the foresight to create a decent interview experience probably is dropping the ball in other critical areas and should be avoided.