3 ms·
No, all he's saying is that you cannot ignore genetics, and that genetics is more reliable than fragmentary historical records. And that those Roman auxiliaries
by ar-jan 9y ago
No, all he's saying is that you cannot ignore genetics, and that genetics is more reliable than fragmentary historical records. And that those Roman auxiliaries would have been Mediterranean, not sub-Saharen Africans.
- DanBC 9y ago> and that genetics is more reliable than fragmentary historical records Geneticists disagree.