3 ms·
> This case isn't about that. That wasn't your question, was it? You asked why he's human garbage, I explained why. I wasn't defending or attacking this case,
by wfunction 9y ago
> This case isn't about that.
That wasn't your question, was it? You asked why he's human garbage, I explained why. I wasn't defending or attacking this case, I was explaining why some think he is human garbage.
- kbenson 9y agoEdit: Whoops, different person. See bottom. > Nowhere was I (or you) saying anything about this case. Your specific words in your original response were "He's human garbage, let him rot." That response was to me saying I think the details of the case lead me to believe that I think he should a light sentence. You very specifically noted through that euphemism that you think he shouldn't get a light sentence in this case because he's human garbage. Edit: Sorry. That was someone else. I was specifically asking in context, but that wasn't you originally. Mea Culpa. Leaving it here with this note so people that saw it previously can see me retraction.
- wfunction 9y agoFor what it's worth, I've colored the usernames on my HN discussions so I don't make mistakes like this. Maybe HN should do that natively.