5 ms·
I don't think (some) people understand; a slick data annotation tool like this is vastly more useful than the 20th variant of GAN that DeepMind produces :)
by plusepsilon 9y ago
I don't think (some) people understand; a slick data annotation tool like this is vastly more useful than the 20th variant of GAN that DeepMind produces :)
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- transcranial 9y agoTotally, I think people have this weird sense of entitlement when it comes to high-quality datasets without the commensurate respect for how they're created or the level of effort that goes into them. Fei-Fei Li gives a good sense for this in her history of ImageNet [1][2]. [1] https://qz.com/1034972/the-data-that-changed-the-direction-of-ai-research-and-possibly-the-world/ https://qz.com/1034972/the-data-that-changed-the-direction-o... [2] http://image-net.org/challenges/talks_2017/imagenet_ilsvrc2017_v1.0.pdf http://image-net.org/challenges/talks_2017/imagenet_ilsvrc20...
- anthonyarroyo 9y agoTotally agree. Annotation effort can explode out of control if you don't have good tooling. Well done, Explosion!