> Does it really make sense in context of the worldview it seems there is a strong postmodernist bent in the "anti-fa" crowd. words are now violence, and some

> Does it really make sense in context of the worldview it seems there is a strong postmodernist bent in the "anti-fa" crowd. words are now violence, and sometimes the use of "violence" is justified to defend against "violence" (ie self-defense and defense of others). nevermind that this equivocation of "violence" means that anti-fa is assaulting, hospitalizing, intimidating and harassing people, and destroying property and businesses. it's all a righteous and necessary defense against "violence". even though the "violence" they "defend" against is... words.