4 ms·
That's a nice UX but the flurry of initial upvotes on this looks kinda fishy, especially given that it's just annotation software.
by rayuela 9y ago
That's a nice UX but the flurry of initial upvotes on this looks kinda fishy, especially given that it's just annotation software.
- rubatuga 9y agoLooks pretty fishy I agree
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- syllogism 9y agoIt's interesting to see how this comes across to people who are outside our ML/NLP bubble. I can definitely relate to the feeling of being confused at why something that looks sort of basic is supposedly significant. It was actually very difficult to build, especially the active learning component for the named entity recognition system.
- eanzenberg 9y agoThis is kinda why we need down-votes for stories, or HN needs better detection of these strategies.
- Gimpei 9y agoI'm a data scientist and getting annotations for our data is one of our most onerous issues. I upvoted this. If it works well, I could see myself using it all the time. Making a model that gets you most of the way there is the easy part; getting clean, annotated data. Uggh.
- IanCal 9y agoYep agreed, we've had to build similar things internally. Getting labelled data is a pain.
- Ethereum 9y agoHow is this fishy? It's potentially a very useful tool lots of people are excited about.