3 ms·
'I was wrong' part 1 was a really a discussion about how wrong / fraudulent some authors were who published in Nature in 2004. It looks like it turned into a b
by dm319 9y ago
'I was wrong' part 1 was a really a discussion about how wrong / fraudulent some authors were who published in Nature in 2004. It looks like it turned into a bit of flame-fest[1], with the original authors chipping in.
[1] https://liorpachter.wordpress.com/2015/05/26/pachters-p-value-prize/#comment-4436 https://liorpachter.wordpress.com/2015/05/26/pachters-p-valu...
- Gatsky 9y agoNo I mean this blog post: https://liorpachter.wordpress.com/2017/08/02/how-not-to-perform-a-differential-expression-analysis-or-science/ https://liorpachter.wordpress.com/2017/08/02/how-not-to-perf...