34 ms·
But OP wrote: "ex-spouse (who had no direct participation in the startup)" => woman didn't contribute. Even though she did.
by kyberias 9y ago
But OP wrote: "ex-spouse (who had no direct participation in the startup)" => woman didn't contribute. Even though she did.
- matthewmacleod 9y agoMy interpretation of that was the more charitable “hey, this made me think about divorce generally”. I can see how it could be interpreted otherwise though.
- ClassyJacket 9y agoThat's still you saying that an ex spouse that didn't contribute can only possibly be a woman.
- tangus 9y agoCome on. The spouse in this case is a woman. Ok, OP already said s/he wasn't referring to this case, it "just made him/her think about divorce generally". Let's leave it already.