3 ms·
This is cool, but it doesn't solve (in fact, exacerbates) my usual complaint with `ls` - I don't know what the arguments are. The example on the site is: e
by untog 9y ago
This is cool, but it doesn't solve (in fact, exacerbates) my usual complaint with `ls` - I don't know what the arguments are. The example on the site is:
exa -bghHliS
Argh! I want to be able to say `ls --size` to get the file sizes. I don't want to remember a million arguments.