> Curate was very specifically chosen. There is moderation - which is about the selection of material to see and its removal... and then there is curation which

> Curate was very specifically chosen. There is moderation - which is about the selection of material to see and its removal... and then there is curation which focuses on maintaining existing material. Right, but I guess I'm sort of suggesting that what is needed is something in-between. "Soft" curation, if you want. Just an idea anyways, but it seems to be like it would be more scalable, and less likely to cause controversy e.g. when something gets deleted. > The "less likelihood" is a binary thing. Stack Overflow can't say "index this, but don't show that result often" to google. Google does what it wants. But yeah I guess that is the crux of the matter.. not much can be done about other people indexing old/bad stuff.