3 ms·
Sure, only around 15 years too late. http://people.csail.mit.edu/seneff/ITX_2013_06_04_Seneff.pdf http://people.csail.mit.edu/seneff/ITX_2013_06_04_Seneff.pdf
by Danihan 9y ago
Sure, only around 15 years too late.
http://people.csail.mit.edu/seneff/ITX_2013_06_04_Seneff.pdf http://people.csail.mit.edu/seneff/ITX_2013_06_04_Seneff.pdf
- tptacek 9y agoRegarding that Senneff cite: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9281240 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9281240
- briantakita 9y agoTwo ad hominems. Here's a possibility. The scientific social networks consist of people who's research is paid for by the same corporations/government agencies with inherent conflicts of interest.
- tptacek 9y agoYes. Every credentialed scientist in the field is bought and paid for by Monsanto. Only the computer scientists can be trusted. That sounds about right for HN logic.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- briantakita 9y ago> Yes. Every credentialed scientist in the field is bought and paid for by Monsanto. I only raised a real possibility that is not factored in the two bullet points. Conflict of Interest. We assume that scientists are somehow immune & should not be questioned, particularly when there is evidence contracting their conclusions. Nothing to do with HN logic. From what it looks like, you are far more of the HN maven than I am...