Agreed. I've been following the spec for a few months and while # is "ugly," it serves the purpose of the concept well and works with the current spec/implement

Agreed. I've been following the spec for a few months and while # is "ugly," it serves the purpose of the concept well and works with the current spec/implementations without much headache. Seems like a win-win to me and I haven't seen a convincing argument for why private # properties shouldn't move forward as they are.