3 ms·
We're discussing a matter of 10s of feet between the near-collision we saw, clipping the tail of one plane, or hitting the plane behind at landing speed, so I i
by stordoff 9y ago
We're discussing a matter of 10s of feet between the near-collision we saw, clipping the tail of one plane, or hitting the plane behind at landing speed, so I imagine the set of "what could have happened" is rather large.
That said, I suspect the following three crashes give _some_ indication of what might have happened:
USAir 1493 - 737 collides with a turbo-prop on landing; the smaller plane is essentially crushed by the 737
Asiana 214 - Landing gear and tail clip seawall on approach
Tenerife disaster - 747 strikes the side of a second 747 a few seconds after leaving the ground on takeoff; engines, lower fuselage and main landing gear struck the plane. 583 fatalities.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USAir_Flight_1493 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USAir_Flight_1493 / https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asiana_Airlines_Flight_214 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asiana_Airlines_Flight_214 / https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tenerife_airport_disaster https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tenerife_airport_disaster
- tajen 9y agoI highly recommend watching the related episode of "Mayday" Air Crash Investigation about Tenerife. Hulls are so fragile that they've often shred up in flight (De Havaillan, DC-9). Landing is around 200-250kmh only, but planes have caught fire just sliding on runways or terrain. The quantity of jet fuel immediately means catastrophe.