4 ms·
My understanding was that he thinks we can potentially automate all human work, just not with computers. A precise task isn't necessary: AI researchers are simp
by JacksonGariety 9y ago
My understanding was that he thinks we can potentially automate all human work, just not with computers. A precise task isn't necessary: AI researchers are simply mistaken about the nature of intelligence.
- yters 9y agoDreyfus doesn't know his comp sci. Everything automatable is computable. The interesting question is whether human intelligence is automatable.
- JacksonGariety 9y ago>everything automatable is computable why do you suppose this?
- yters 9y agoEverything physical is computable.
- JacksonGariety 9y agoSo you have to prove that all human work is physical when some of it doesn't seem to be physical at all (creative work).
- yters 9y agoYes the non-physical work is not automatable.