3 ms·
The article uses the definition that "same rank" == "same work", which is ridiculous for many reasons, one in particular being that title often corresponds to a
by danharaj 9y ago
The article uses the definition that "same rank" == "same work", which is ridiculous for many reasons, one in particular being that title often corresponds to a pay level for an area of work covered by a ladder of such titles so by definition it will be true that such a gap is insignificant.
> According to data for 8.7m employees worldwide gathered by Korn Ferry, a consultancy, women in Britain make just 1% less than men who have the same function and level at the same employer.
- cisanti 9y agoIf you tell a lie enough times, with a little help from the people who can benefit, it becomes irrefutable truth. And dare you to question it!
- FT_intern 9y agoIt's not ridiculous because the alternative is almost impossible to quantify and calculate
- micahbright 9y agoIt's easy, just like the income tax. Get into every nook and cranny of how things are done and control absolutely everything.