4 ms·

And in kubernetes land, you can run an ubuntu container and do that just as well. Except, you'll lose out on having all the shared resources and state of your h

And in kubernetes land, you can run an ubuntu container and do that just as well. Except, you'll lose out on having all the shared resources and state of your host machine. If that sounds scary to you, you should take a minute to think about it the other way - Under the mesos realm, every process can modify the state shared by every other process. If that hasn't convinced you off mesos, than I wish you all the luck you deserve, but not the luck you'll need.

falsedan 9y ago
3/10 patronizing and FUD. Mesos is happy to limit resources with cgroups etc. When you say every process can modify the state shared by every other process in italics (the scariest type variant), do you mean ‘the filesystem’? Mesos has a swathe of isolators to choose from to enforce separation. Mesos is also happy to let tasks run as a specific user, so the good old Unix process model will stop random tasks from stomping each other. Did you see the other comments drawing attention to the inequality of the Mesos/Kubernetes comparison & suggesting Marathon as the more appropriate peer technology?