4 ms·
I understand the disappointment and frustration here, but choosing to be out $90 for something that will never be used—vs. recouping some money and having the o
by settsu 9y ago
I understand the disappointment and frustration here, but choosing to be out $90 for something that will never be used—vs. recouping some money and having the offending item gone—seems like a questionable decision.
- neo4sure 9y agoPlease read carefully, it will never be used because it was not as advertised"
- fnj 9y ago> it was not as advertised I read carefully, and did not see anything to suggest the item was not as advertised. I saw someone complain that they did not like various aspects. Absent an explicit money-back guarantee of satisfaction, I see no reason why the vendor should have to cater to every buyer's demand.
- threatofrain 9y agoI'd agree that $90 for a single item seems quite high to throw away without contention. My ballpark would be closer to $20-30, because it's not unusual for the fee to be over $10. But that's my own subjective feeling, and I imagine others put their range higher or lower based on factors like distance to UPS store or Amazon locker, or how much they logistically have on their plate.