3 ms·
If the defendant is known to possess incriminating evidence then you already have all the proof you need. The law is an oxymoron and dangerous.
by jostmey 9y ago
If the defendant is known to possess incriminating evidence then you already have all the proof you need. The law is an oxymoron and dangerous.
- pavel_lishin 9y ago> If the defendant is known to possess incriminating evidence then you already have all the proof you need. Knowing that someone has evidence isn't the same thing as having that evidence.
- am1988 9y agoHe took confidential documents is a hard claim to verify if they end up destroyed before the trial. by your logic would a search order ever be required?