I don't like this argument. Blindly attempting to suppress writings because of the actions of the author, if it worked, might serve to devalue violence as mark

I don't like this argument. Blindly attempting to suppress writings because of the actions of the author, if it worked, might serve to devalue violence as marketing, but it is never going to keep words from the true believers, who will just overvalue them because they're suppressed. It also damages our ability to discuss the complaints voiced. Like it or not, some ideas that in the past have been promoted via violence turned out to be correct. Finally, history is important. This, I hope, needs no explanation.