4 ms·
Even if it did, bloody why? Why why why would you do this. I'm sorry but I'm no fan of Erlang syntax. Wouldn't it be much better to port another language to th
by dublinclontarf 16y ago
Even if it did, bloody why? Why why why would you do this. I'm sorry but I'm no fan of Erlang syntax.
Wouldn't it be much better to port another language to the Erlang VM (like Ruby) than the other way around?
- tyweir 16y agoI'm puzzled why you would question the motivation of porting erlang to run atop the JVM. Just because you don't like erlang syntax and would prefer to have ruby on top of BEAM, doesn't mean that others should not undertake this port. Rather than question erjang, why not start your ruby/BEAM port? Edit: better grammar.
- dublinclontarf 16y agoI'm sorry but I really dislike Erlangs syntax more than I like it's concurrency. I'm not saying Erlangs bad just that I hate how it looks.
- lukev 16y agoMaybe others don't share your opinions. Just a thought.
- dublinclontarf 16y agoProbably not, they're not based on any form of logic.