3 ms·
In my part of the world, we used the Borland compilers for MS-DOS, Turbo C and Turbo C++. Turbo Assembler and Turbo Pascal was also popular. Never heard of Zort
by turboturb 9y ago
In my part of the world, we used the Borland compilers for MS-DOS, Turbo C and Turbo C++. Turbo Assembler and Turbo Pascal was also popular.
Never heard of Zortech C++ before
- WalterBright 9y agoBorland decided to develop TC++ because of the success of ZTC++. (I know some of the people involved.) Before ZTC++, C++ was a niche language, and Borland was having great success with Turbo Pascal. ZTC++ came out in 1987, and TC++ in 1990. After the success of ZTC++ and TC++, Microsoft changed direction and decided to develop a C++ compiler, too. I heard (but was never able to confirm) that Microsoft had earlier been developing their own object oriented extensions to C called C*.
- p0nce 9y agoComing from Turbo Pascal TC++ was a bit underwhelming. When I tried it didn't colour syntax, there was those weird #include and compin=ling felt so slow. So my first contact with C was pretty negative :\
- IncRnd 9y agoZTC was a fantastic compiler, that is until it was purchased by Symantec, renamed, and become slow and bloated. I could even say something similar about turbo c vs turbo c++, but that was more due to the language issues with c++ vs c.