3 ms·
For PHP, you'd want to use IUS instead: https://dl.iuscommunity.org/pub/ius/stable/CentOS/7/x86_64/repoview/development.languages.group.html https://dl.iuscommu
by lima 9y ago
For PHP, you'd want to use IUS instead: https://dl.iuscommunity.org/pub/ius/stable/CentOS/7/x86_64/repoview/development.languages.group.html https://dl.iuscommunity.org/pub/ius/stable/CentOS/7/x86_64/r...
Source repo: https://github.com/iuscommunity-pkg/php71u https://github.com/iuscommunity-pkg/php71u
For security reasons, I'm directly building the packages from Git. Works like a charm, and I don't have to include many different third party repos or introduce additional security dependencies.
Generally, Red Hat backports security fixes without incrementing the version number (though that doesn't seem to be the case here).
- bubblethink 9y agoHow does this compare to remi's repos ?
- level3 9y agoPersonally I prefer remi because package names are kept the same, making it easier to upgrade. With IUS, the version is part of the package name (i.e. "yum install php71"), which tends to make maintenance and configuration messier.