4 ms·

My quote was the entirety of Count 1. I believe a count is a distinct offence[0]. [0]http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/count http://legal-dictionar

• timthorn 9y ago
  All the numbered paragraphs are subject to the rider "As the Particulars of that offence make clear, with the intention of assisting another to commit acts of terrorism, you engaged in conduct in preparation for giving effect to that intention namely:" The relevant legislation is here: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/11/section/5 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/11/section/5
  • discombobulate 9y ago
    I don't know enough about the subject to defend my position. Guess I'll just concede: assigning a reasonable probability of you being correct.
• dragonwriter 9y ago
  > My quote was the entirety of Count 1. No, it's not. It's the entirety of the first numbered point (of six) on page 1; all six of the numbered points there, as well as the paragraph leading into the numbered list and all but the last two paragraphs of page 2 address Count 1. Count 2 is addressed in the penultimate paragraph of page 2, and Count 3 is addressed in the final paragraph of page 2, which carries over onto page 3. The remainder of the document is not recounting the offenses but discussing other sentencing factors. There are only 3 counts (as stated at the very beginning of the document), so even if the beginning of the discussion of each count weren't explicitly marked in a parenthetical, it would be easy to see that the numbers of the six-item numbered list could not be count numbers.