3 ms·
> As to the models, when the models failed to predict reality, they should have been thrown out. What models have failed to predict reality?, all the models ha
by Oletros 9y ago
> As to the models, when the models failed to predict reality, they should have been thrown out.
What models have failed to predict reality?, all the models have failed?
> Of course I don't have any proof, because the internal deliberations are not public, the code for the models is not public, and the revisions to the data and models are not public.
Really?
> Frankly, I'd be very happy if they would release the source code for the models so we could see what a clusterfuck they are.
So, you don't have any proof, you don't know that the IPCC models have been aligned with reality but you claim that they are a clusterfuck.
I think that you didn't look very deeply, or perhaps, you deep only on some sites that are not very scientifics.
- jeremyt 9y agoOf course I don't have any proof. If I had proof, there wouldn't be any discussion. A five minute Google search will show you that the vast majority of the models have ranged from being somewhat inaccurate to wildly inaccurate all in the direction of predicting more global warming. Furthermore, I'm not aware of any other models with publicly released source code. In my opinion, that's ridiculous, since people want us to literally re-organize the economy around these predictions. Do you want to defend the idea of keeping the source code for the models private?