5 ms·

I'm guessing but it seems logical that phones are not the place you want to do extra graphics rendering if you don't have to.

• GuB-42 9y ago
  Modern smartphones have quite competent GPUs. They can run 3D games at 1080p/60fps. They could raymarch circles around an svg icon. And if it wasn't enough, the renderings could be cached for later use.
  • dapreja 9y ago
    TBH not many people consider SVG format worth the effort unless the graphic is made from scratch. 1) an organization rarely rationalizes having a UI dev spend 6 something hours either transforming an existing PNG to an SVG, or spending 12 hours compleitly replicate an existing design in photoshop only for it to be exportable as an SVG. I could be far fe5ching things but sometimes business or upper management get short sighted on the small things. Probably there is no rationalizarion in spending extra effort in having these graphics all svg format, thus improving your application's load and bandwidth utilization, vs pumping more funds towards other easier quicker solutions.
    • syrrim 9y ago
      >replicate an existing design in photoshop AFAIK, the majority of designs are created in photoshop or illustrator. No conversion nessecary. In any case, I would consider it a liability if I didn't have my designs in an editable format. What if tommorow I realized I wanted a variant in a different color? Or I decided I wanted to use a different background? If all I had was a bitmap logo, I would consider it worthwhile to have someone change it into a scalable format anyways, even if I wanted to transfer them as PNGs. Also, numerous free tool exist to convert bitmaps to SVG. Using one of these, plus some manual smoothing and correction, I'm sure the conversion would take no more than half an hour.
  • kllrnohj 9y ago
    GPUs do not like SVGs. They don't handle them well at all. Most SVGs are CPU-rasterized as a result.
    • Zelizz 9y ago
      So you just CPU-rasterize out to a buffer, and blit it to the screen. After the initial render, it's equivalent to the PNG. The application essentially decompresses its assets on launch.
    • vbezhenar 9y ago
      May be SVG is not the best vector format after all. May be we need something simpler, where every item directly maps to GPU graphics calls, also binary would help.
      • AstralStorm 9y ago
        GPUs have graphic calls anymore. At best they have fragment and pixel shaders. Converting a vector graphic into a good shader is not trivial, compared to using the built in functions of texturing. It gets even worse once you realize how limited older mobile GPUs are or what are the incompatible subsets of features supported at decent performance.
      • kllrnohj 9y ago
        If you want something simpler that works with GPUs it needs to be exclusively built out of triangles and/or code that can operate on a single pixel independently of its neighbors. Resolution independent formats are inherently anti-triangle and by the time you've hit triangles you already have a target resolution in mind. Or put another way, GPUs really don't like vector graphics in general. That's not what they're built for or good at.
        • yellowapple 9y ago
          GPUs like vector graphics just fine; rasterizing vector graphics is literally what GPUs are designed to do. It's infinitely scalable vector graphics that they tend to dislike. Once you've subdivided your curves and such into triangles/vertices/etc., the GPU ends up being a lot happier about its existence.
• ReverseCold 9y ago
  Rendering svg icons sounds like a non issue for any "smartphone" made possibly ever.