3 ms·

Hi nostrademons, do you mind if I put this observation onto Wikipedia if it is not already there? I would add the cyclic/acyclic observation of sb's reply also.

• nostrademons 16y ago
  I don't mind, but I'm guessing it'll get tagged with [citation needed], and I don't know what an appropriate citation for it is.
  • jewbacca 16y ago
    The extent of my experience on the topic is in half-comprehending hobbyist's awe and the inclusion of okmij on my "personal heroes and demigods" list. The only word I could half-heartedly associate with this structure is the incredibly lame "hylomorphism"... which actually kinda generally expresses the pattern of much of computing. It's 5 AM and I'm going to sleep, but I'll leave you with the the most plausible leaves of a very brief search towards finding some recognized formal name for this structure: http://blog.sigfpe.com/2009/07/monad-for-combinatorial-search-with.html http://blog.sigfpe.com/2009/07/monad-for-combinatorial-searc... http://spivey.oriel.ox.ac.uk/mike/search-jfp.pdf http://spivey.oriel.ox.ac.uk/mike/search-jfp.pdf http://www.cs.au.dk/~gerth/papers/jfp96.pdf http://www.cs.au.dk/~gerth/papers/jfp96.pdf If you really don't like yourself, try digging here: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/pointless-haskell/0.0.1/doc/html/Generics-Pointless-RecursionPatterns.html http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/pointless-haskel... http://comonad.com/reader/2009/recursion-schemes/ http://comonad.com/reader/2009/recursion-schemes/