3 ms·
> but if it makes an honest effort to be ergonomic for embedded There are constant improvements but I wouldn't say we're there yet. I think we will be though,
by Manishearth 9y ago
> but if it makes an honest effort to be ergonomic for embedded
There are constant improvements but I wouldn't say we're there yet. I think we will be though, embedded is something a lot of folks care about.
- steveklabnik 9y agoThe latest on this front: http://blog.japaric.io/rtfm-v2/ http://blog.japaric.io/rtfm-v2/
- test9753 9y agoFound this paper useful: "The Case for Writing a Kernel in Rust" (https://www.tockos.org/assets/papers/rust-kernel-apsys2017.pdf https://www.tockos.org/assets/papers/rust-kernel-apsys2017.p...) linked from the "tock os" blog post: https://www.tockos.org/blog/2017/apsys-paper/ https://www.tockos.org/blog/2017/apsys-paper/
- steveklabnik 9y agoYes, this is a good paper, but was posted after my comment :)
- davemp 9y agoGood to hear. I'm sure there is a large group of developers sitting on the sidelines that check in from time to time hoping to be able to leave C behind. Has anyone on the rust team tried reaching out to get input/contributions from companies who are heavily invested in the embedded world? I know xilinx pours a lot of effort into language research, they do seem like an very proprietary company though.
- Manishearth 9y agoWe reach out and talk with companies regularly. We are both happy to organize a meeting with companies who approach us, and often (~yearly) organize calls with multiple companies using or evaluating Rust at once whom we reach out to. I believe there have been some of these focused on embedded stuff, but I wasn't on these calls.